Mother-in-Law

David’s mother, Helen, never liked me. When we were all together—and the Waldos gathered often—she either ignored my contributions to conversations or she emitted judgmental tongue clicks and grunts. She never looked at me and she never allowed even the shortest dialogue about anything meaningful. This wasn’t a subtle loathing; it was palpable and meant to injure. David’s sister said the disapproval was because I’d married the favorite child, and that Helen wouldn’t have liked anyone he married—although it didn’t seem like she treated her other daughter-in-law, Betty, any better. Betty, however, was gifted when it came to rising above, while I sometimes became so hurt and furious that my hands would tremble. Although, realistically speaking, we spent years living in other countries and any concern over my relationship with Helen fell away when we flew away.  

Also, her displeasure with me was puzzling. I’m aware that I’m sometimes intense when intensity isn’t called for. And when things don’t go my way, I tend to get snippy—well, who doesn’t? But I have redeeming qualities. I made her son happy. I was an exceptional mother to her grandsons. I’m intuitive, responsible, loyal, and I have a sense of humor. See? All good traits.  

As to her inclinations, Helen was difficult to decipher. She held to antiquated directives, such as boys and men should remove their hats when they enter a room, and it’s rude to chew gum in public. One rule that, when broken, got her riled was the “he and I” rule. She would noticeably cringe when someone said, “me and him,” or a variation thereof. While it is atrocious grammar, for some, pronouns can be tricky—however, she would let this small error form her everlasting opinion. All these standards seemed prim and rigid, which was confounding considering the pleasure she took in telling dirty jokes.

During the few years we lived in Sugar Land, Helen began to have problems coping. There were illnesses and traffic accidents until, at one point, on the phone, she told David that shopping and bringing the groceries in had so exhausted her that she was unable to go back outside and close the car door. So, after much familial discussion, it was decided that she should go into a three-step nursing home—moderate care, full care, and hospice.

Helen had smoked all her life, so it wasn’t unexpected that age came at her with unrelenting cruelty. A toe infection, caused by a pedicure, led to an amputation, which didn’t heal; and when the toe wound became gangrenous, her foot was taken, and that also didn’t heal; then off came all below her knee. And not long after, the whole leg was gone.

And throughout the operations and hospitalizations, her care fell to the daughters-in-law. Where were her sons? Nowhere to be found.

As I lived an hour away, Betty, was the one on the front lines. But I did my share, too. I drove the distance to take Helen to doctor appointments, physical therapy, and on her errands. Once, after Christmas, she had me drive her to every store in the area so she could exchange or get money back on every Christmas present Betty had given her. This woman who had treated me like a mangy stray throughout most of my adult life, showed no appreciation, and, in fact, seemed to view my services as her right.

On one horrendously long day I took her to a medical appointment and, because she was fading in and out of consciousness, the doctor instructed me to take her to the emergency room, which I did. When it looked like it was going to be a long wait in the ER, she had me roll her outside so she could smoke. I returned inside to listen for her name to be called, while outside she dropped her cigarette and, fragile and woozy as she was, bent over to pick it up, and in doing so, toppled from her wheelchair and on to the cold hard concrete, scratching her face and badly bruising her arm and shoulder. The fall got the ER’s attention and she was taken in immediately, where they ran tests, gave her five units of blood, and admitted her. I stayed with her throughout, but not with love in my heart. I did it begrudgingly, constantly checking the time, and wishing to be at home adhering to my usual schedule.

And again—where were her sons?  

I, too, have sons.

Helen’s groundless meanness. My lack of compassion. The sons staying away. Altogether, an ugly picture.

Having experienced such a thorny relationship with my husband’s mother, I have vowed to be the perfect mother-in-law. I won’t order my sons’ wives around or give them unwanted advice. I’ll never judge. I’ll be always gracious, never taking their kindnesses for granted. I won’t intrude into their marriages. I’ll support them in every way and make certain they know that I’m proud of them. I’ll never, ever be mean spirited toward them or make them think they aren’t good enough. All these intentions I’ve created so that if I fall victim to infirmity as Helen did, my sons’ wives will view me with sympathy and consideration rather than as an imposition and a duty. So, as I said, in the mother-in-law arena I aim for perfection, giving no offense and being nothing but docile and benign.

“How’s that working out for you, Jen?” you ask.

“How do you think?” is my response.

Brunch at True Food

Is this not the most beautiful baby you’ve ever seen?

A Serendipitous Two Minutes

I like to stick to a schedule. I get up every morning at four-thirty, respond to emails, glance at the news feeds, and then write for a couple of hours. Later in the morning I exercise—sometimes it’s an hour on the elliptical and sometimes it’s a couple of hours of pickleball. The vexing result of applying discipline to my days is that I’ve gained a reputation for being rigid, which isn’t true. I can readjust. And, considering the routines of absolutely every other person I know, I’m not the only one who adheres to a daily agenda.

“You’re unbending because you’re German,” says David, who’s the most inflexible person I know. Every day he eats the same thing for breakfast, exercises in the same way, at the same time, and at the same place. From his everyday habits, he deviates never.

Most certainly, I’m fond of the schedule I’ve created for myself, and the fact that it’s fixing to be disrupted has me grumbling. Our cleaning lady, who usually comes on Saturday mornings, has asked to change her time to Friday afternoon because she’s catching a ride to her hometown in Mexico to spend Christmas with her family. I imagine giving in to my inclination: “No, Maria, you may not spend the holiday with your loved ones! You must stay here and clean my house! Stick to the plan!”

As I’m not a grinch, I can hardly deny her request. Nevertheless, the situation looms. For me, two until six on a Friday is a pain. On any other day I’d go to Bee Cave, a shopping hub half an hour away; but that would put my return drive during the heaviest traffic of the week. The seventy-one corridor gets packed, sometimes even completely clogged, as commuters, frantic to start their weekend, spill out of Austin and flood the surrounding highways and byways. Also to be taken into account is the road construction that never seems to end.

And Maria’s schedule isn’t the only irregularity that’s exasperating. I have a haircut today at three, and I prefer the appointment to be at one because it’s convenient to run errands afterward, which gets me home at three. Jennifer Hair’s December calendar filled up early, however, so three o’clock it must be. To my dismay, I’ll be starting out at the time I’d ordinarily be getting home, which pertains in that my little dog, Dilly, needs her afternoon treat at exactly three-fifteen; otherwise, in a frenzy, she trembles. Wildly panicked, she barks, jumps up and down, and turns in circles. Treat-treat-treat!

Here's an aside: My hair person’s name is Jennifer, as is mine. And, because it bothers me to call someone else by my name, I differentiate by calling her Jennifer Hair. This might sound egotistical, possibly a little insane, but it’s not like I was raised as a Cindy or a Susan. Throughout my life I have been the only Jennifer. It’s understandable that, considering this background, I would struggle to hang on to my individuality.

Sorry for the digression; and back to the admittedly minor inconveniences that are on my mind as I put in time on the elliptical.

My phone, placed nearby, interrupts my musings with a ting! I leap nimbly from the machine and read the message. It’s from Maria, who wants to come on Thursday morning at nine-thirty rather than Friday at two. How bizarrely coincidental. I was dreading the arrangement, and now it’s changed for the better. Merrily, I text her my approval of this latest variation, and return to the elliptical.

A minute later, another ting, another text; this one from Jennifer Hair. She’s had a cancellation at one and, knowing my predilections, wants to know if I’d like the slot. Yes please!

Another unexpected and happy concurrence, causing me thusly to ponder: In the course of a lifetime, how often does a situation change from what one doesn’t want to what one does want? And how often does this happen twice in such quick succession? The answer: so seldomly that it’s only a notch above never.

And though I concede that the two instances of serendipity are not life-altering, they do make me wonder if these delightful vicissitudes are the karmic result of an action I took or didn’t take. Or is it possible that I’ve inadvertently developed a gift for planting my desires into other people’s minds? And if so, how do I prolong this ability, and how far afield do my powers reach? Considering this newfound skill, the focal question becomes what do I want and whose mind must I control to get it? 

Here I am, giving Clem her bottle. As you can see, Dilly is a very needy dog.

During hunting season the most sought-after bucks hide in our backyard.

Merry Christmas!

Jen on Her Birthday

Sixty-five doesn’t feel any different than sixty-four. Hmm. I’m now officially a senior citizen. What kind of old woman do I want to be? The stooped lumbering kind who has weekly appointments at the doctor’s office and goes on about every ache and ailment? The eccentric who talks the ears off strangers? Or the enthusiastic smiling sort who enjoys trying new things? A no-brainer, right? Here’s what I’m doing at sixty-five:

I’ve changed my purse mojo. I’ve always stayed away from large purses, choosing to carry small cross-body bags that only have room for cash, credit cards, and a phone. I figured a lightweight purse would be better if I needed to make a quick get-away from. . . whatever. But lately I’ve become impatient with the sparsity of personal items. I want easy and constant access to my reading glasses and sunglasses. I want a mirror and a comb, hand lotion, a tissue packet, and lip balm. So I go to a local department store, buy a larger purse, take it home and hand it to David, saying, “This is the exceptional gift you got me for my birthday. I love it. Thank you.” On the designated morning, he hands it to me and, as though I’ve never seen it before, says, “They had a huge selection and it was a difficult decision, but I think this is the one you would have chosen. Happy Birthday.”

I’ve added an activity. Pickleball, AKA tennis for old people. A friend suggests we attend a lesson; and I know I need more exercise, so I go. Though I’m clumsy and prone to falling, I’m surprised by how much I enjoy the movement and the sweating. It’s a popular sport. There are leagues and tournaments. All day every day, pickleballers are always playing somewhere in the area. It doesn’t matter if I’m not good enough to compete on a ladder because I’m having fun and meeting new people and, as long as we focus on the game and keep things superficial, we all get along. The reason I say that about being superficial is because fanatical belief in conspiracy theories abounds in this part of Texas, and one of the most well-liked local pickleballers is a man I once brought up in a derogatory way in a blog posting—the one about the guy who, over dinner at a mutual friend’s house, claimed to “know for a fact” that Michelle Obama was a hermaphrodite and that Obama’s daughters were paid actors, not Barak and Michelle’s kids at all. I assumed that he didn’t know about the scathing blog, but it turns out I was wrong. So, as often happens, I’ve managed to create friction where there should be peace. As pertains to my new diversion, I intend to keep my head down so I don’t run into him or his wife.

Also, I’m investing a bit of time and money in my sixty-something appearance. For the last couple of years my hair guru has been encouraging me to grow my hair out. She didn’t approve of the shorter style, and in general seemed to feel that if it were longer I’d have more choices. Several months ago I decided to take her advice, thinking, well, it’s only hair, and it won’t hurt to try it her way. Sadly, it’s become a stringy mess that I hate with astonishing intensity. I don’t know what I’m supposed to do with all this crappy fluff in front of my ears. I hate the way the pointy ends poke my eyes and tickle my cheeks. So tomorrow I’m getting it cut and high-lighted. This isn’t so much making a change as it is going back to the way I like myself most.

Another appearance-related endeavor is that I’m going to Botox a few wrinkles—the downward slashes between my eyebrows, a couple of crinkled pouches at the corners of my eyes. I don’t think I’ll do anything about the forehead wrinkles, though. I’ve had my thought lines since I was a child. Seriously, there they are, in my fifth-grade picture, caused by brows raised in constant surprise; and here my eyebrows still are, with me at sixty-five, lifted in amazement at the things that go on in the world. So yes, Botox: a way to postpone the inevitable for just a while.

An unpleasant result of turning sixty-five is that it involves going through the social security bureaucracy, getting signed up for Medicare, changing my meds to suit their rules. How tedious. While the other changes I’m making are positive, the changes caused by Medicare are disturbing in that the two types of eyedrops I’m prescribed cost over forty-five hundred dollars every quarter. I used to meet the deductible in the first three months and the insurance paid for the rest of the year; but now, in this topsy-turvy shift, Medicare meets their self-determined deductible in the first quarter and then I pay for the rest of the year. So my cost almost triples and that sucks.

Ending on a note of happiness—my most wonderful recent biggie is that I’ve become a grandmother to an adorable baby, Clementine. If it weren’t for the inconvenient periodic requirement for passport renewal, I would’ve hopped over to London immediately to meet her. But I’m receiving daily photos and videos and the occasional facetime chat, and it’s fun to track the baby’s growth and progress, even if it’s from a distance. Sam, Julia, and the baby are traveling here for Thanksgiving, which promises to be quite a get-together, as the extended family also wants to welcome the new addition. In conclusion, Clementine is precious and I’m happy for my son and his wife, because raising a child adds a glorious, painful, and complex sense of accountability that expands one’s soul and can be found in no other endeavor.  

Anyway, Happy Birthday, me!

Welcome to the world, Clementine!

Can you believe he asked me what I plan to do with it?

Curtis gave me the visor for my birthday. Stylish, right?

The Price of Antagonism

I was living in Cairo when Leon Uris’s The Haj was published. As a result of the timing, my days were inundated by Arab traditions and the Arab mindset as I was reading the novel. Coincidentally and irrelevantly, I was living in Singapore when Crazy Rich Asians came out, which was amusing because my Singaporean friends loved that book—and it, as with The Haj, was exactly spot-on.

This quote describing the middle-eastern hierachy, taken from the closing of the second chapter of The Haj, was so purely and accurately blood-chilling that it’s stayed with me all these years:

“It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world. And all of us against the infidel.”

To think that people live with this chain of antipathy as their truth is horrifying and heartbreaking. Suspicion, selfishness, corruption, and animosity; criticism, derision, scheming, and manipulation. How stressful. As to the quote, I imagine this concise summary of an entire culture is underlined in the Kindle version. If you haven’t read The Haj, I highly recommend it.

So. Negativity.

There was a woman who came to Mahjong for a while. She played well and we were glad to have her. She took the game seriously, which is fine to a point; but this seriousness was the foundation of her personality—she had no sense of humor, and when she did laugh it was at someone else’s expense. She was quick to assign culpability and always seemed to be planning revenge for some small slight or perceived lack of respect. Her realtor had cheated her. Her doctor had done a poor job of a repair. When she moved to the area her neighbors didn’t come over and welcome her and so she never shared a friendly wave with them or acknowledged them in any way. One time she arrived at Mahjong furious with her brother. I asked her what he’d done to draw her ire and she replied, “He said he’d call me and he didn’t.” For this infraction she punished him by not speaking to him for six months, a punishment he likely enjoyed. She must be a horror to live with. She dropped our group a couple of years ago. I doubt she liked any of us.

A couple we occasionally socialized with in Holland only got along with one another when they had a common enemy—a family member who’d behaved badly in a business deal, a friend who hadn’t been complimentary enough about their new car, a neighbor whose dog sometimes barked. When they had no target for their antagonism, they turned on each other, screaming at one another for hours, letting loose words that should never be said; and then entering a cold silence that could last for weeks. When I pointed this pattern out to the wife she laughed and said, “Oh, I know. When I get tired of fighting with him, I get him all stirred up about something someone else has done.” She seemed satisfied with the dynamic.

Where did the pleasure they found in rancor come from? Are some people born sour? Do they crave the drama found in severe nastiness? Or is it a state that started small and expanded with each failure, each broken heart, each disparagement?  

I’m pretty sure this is the way it happened with Trina. Her memorial service was last weekend. Fifteen people were there, and, with the exception of her boss, we all loved her. The friend who had taken care of her during her last days stood up to speak. She started crying almost immediately, but it soon became apparent that the source of her emotions wasn’t the loss of my sister; it was a reaction to the trauma she’d experienced during the few months she’d cared for her. With words riding on sobs, she described how hypercritical and exhausting Trina had been, how difficult she was to please, how rigidly she went through her days, how oppressive her presence could be, how she belittled everyone who didn’t think exactly as she thought. Though this was not traditional or appropriate for the setting, I could identify. I, too, had been traumatized by Trina—her rage, her jealousy, all the hateful blame heaped on me again and again through a period of many years. When it was my turn to speak, I told of what a happy child Trina had been and how she’d enriched my teen years. I didn’t share that our relationship had slowly morphed into a Bette Davis/Joan Crawford situation, and how vicious my sister had acted toward me the last time I saw her—though, to the other mourners, I did admit that her constant bitterness had caused me to walk away. If not for Trina’s actions, I would’ve been there to see her through her second and last battle with cancer, but I didn’t even know she was sick until the last week or so of her life. Her friend had been there and her sister had not. So now another negative emotion has been added to the dark basket I carry—guilt. A hell of a legacy, sister.

We attended another memorial service yesterday morning. It was similar in style in that people stood and told stories about their experiences with the deceased. But these were upbeat anecdotes about how generous the departed had been, how her laughter cheered others, how she took joy in her work at her church and in the community garden. It was all about how much she gave and how much she’ll be missed.

I wish there were a deeper takeaway from this other than grouchiness bad, joy good. Why is it that a circumstance that lowers one person into permanent gloom causes another to rise up and move forward? I guess, for me, the lesson here is that we each have a choice in how we treat others. We have the ability to control our actions, our thoughts, and what our tongues set free into the world. It’s what our brains do and it’s why God gave them to us. And I see that once again I’ve revealed my intolerance. I need to work on that. As to Trina and her tragic end, I am putting that behind me. And how will I do that? Well, every time a bleak thought enters my mind, I’m going to turn away from it. Control.

Dunes on Lake Michigan a couple of weeks ago.